Connect with us
  • Elysium


What are FES devices and how can they be used to treat upper motor neuron conditions?



Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) was first documented as a treatment option for dorsiflexion weakness post CVA, in 1961 by Liberson et al. Since then there have been numerous studies into the use of FES in upper motor neuron conditions and the NHS integrated FES into its services in the late 1980s.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) released the following guideline; Electrical stimulation for drop foot of central neurological origin, [IPG278] in January 2009. The guideline states that FES can be routinely offered as a treatment option for people with foot drop, caused by damage to the brain or spinal cord, if the health professional considers it is appropriate.

An FES device commonly supplied by the NHS utilises single self-adhesive electrode pads, which are positioned over the required nerve and muscles belly. The electrodes connect to the control box/ pulse generator via long wires, which run inside the patient’s trouser leg and attach onto the box situated on their belt. In some instances, the heel switch may also be attached via wires, resulting in cables running the full length of the leg.  There are now more readily available wireless heel switches, which require a sizable box to be clipped to the collar of the shoe in order to transmit information to the control box.

Bioness has developed the L300 Go and L100 Go, lower leg FES devices with wireless technology.

The L300 Go (left) and the L100 Go (right).

The simple design makes it easy for users to don/doff, with the potential for single-handed application. The self-contained electric pulse generator (EPG) uses accelerometers and gyroscopes to provide 3D motion detection in all 3 kinematic planes and enables users to walk without the need for a heel switch, opening up freedom of choice for footwear and allowing the user to walk barefoot. The 3D motion detection and learning algorithm provides consistent stimulation, deployed in 0.01seconds and adapts to the users gait dynamics.

There is a range of electrodes available for use with the L300 Go and L100 Go. The variety of options are designed to provide easy day-to-day use. In the simplest format, the electrodes should be ran under a tap to dampen, patted dry and then clipped into the cuff using the colour co-ordinated poppers. The cuff can then be applied to the leg, using the orange marker to position below the patella and turned on to walk, providing easily reproducible stimulation. The simple system prevents the need for ‘fishing’ for the correct stimulation spot and saves the user time and frustrations as part of their morning routine.

The image below highlights the type of electrodes, followed by a brief description of their benefits:

Quick fit electrodes: Provide dorsiflexion control, inversion and eversion can be altered in small amounts by adjusting the cuffs position, or altering the waveform, phase duration and/ or pulse rate. If further control of the inversion/eversion position is required then the clinician may look to use the alternative electrodes.

Steering electrodes: Allow individualised control of inversion and eversion as well as the standard dorsiflexion. By adjusting the stimulation through the medial and lateral electrode, foot alignment can be optimised for the user. No more excessive eversion!

In cases where there is unique anatomy/ or skin sensitivity, the use of round cloth or hydrogel electrodes can overcome this, allowing the clinician to position the electrodes anywhere within the region of the cuff. Using electrode bases, these electrodes remain in position on the cuff between each days use so that the user does not have to reassess the position on a daily basis.

The range of electrodes ensures that the patient’s needs can be met most efficiently and if these needs change over time, then the electrode type can be changed in accordance to this.

The L300 Go is also available with an upgrade thigh cuff or the thigh can be used as a standalone option. The thigh can be used to stimulate either the quadriceps or hamstrings. The thigh cuff also uses clip in electrodes and allows for easy replication of position. The stimulation is most commonly applied to the hamstrings to resist hyperextension. In this position, stimulation can be set to occur in both stance and/or swing phase, helping to resist hyperextension but also offering support to transition the knee from terminal stance into swing phase in patients who walk with a stiff knee gait pattern.

Both the L300 Go and L100 Go, can be programmed for both gait and training mode. Training mode can be run in 30 minute cycles, with the stimulation intensity (mA) independent of that set for gait mode, allowing the user to build up tolerance, facilitate muscle re-education and maintain range of motion. In addition when using the thigh unit, a cycling mode is available which can be programmed to enable the user to work with stimulation on a static bike.

Once set up by the certified clinician, the FES devices can be controlled either directly from the cuff or via the users phone, using the MyBioness App. The app allows users to turn the stimulation on and off, switch between modes and to increase and decrease stimulation within a small range of the clinicians determined settings, optimising the ability to adjust the intensity depending on their requirements throughout the day.

The L300 Go and L100 Go have many of the same great features including; 3D motion, bluetooth programming, use of the MyBioness App and single channel stimulation. The L300 Go provides additional features including multi-channel stimulation, the ability to upgrade and include the thigh cuff, optional foot sensor and control unit (worn around the neck). For progressive conditions, the L300 Go can provide flexibility and additional support if and when required.

If you would like to know more about any of these Bioness products or would like to see case studies of the product in action please feel free to get in touch via

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


“I wouldn’t wish it on anyone, but I’m glad my brain tumour happened in a way”



Helen and Megan have both experienced cancer in different forms

After Helen Bulbeck’s daughter Megan was diagnosed with a brain tumour, the whole family was left isolated with little to no support. Now she is using this experience, plus her own journey with cancer, to help run the UK’s leading brain tumour support charity Brainstrust.

“It was at the time when Rohypnol was doing the rounds in the local pub, so I just thought maybe her drink had been spiked.”

This was Helen Bulbeck’s initial reaction to her daughter, Megan, collapsing after a night out and being omitted to A&E in 2006.

She later realised that it was the start of a lengthy battle, as MRI scans revealed Megan had a brain tumour.

To complicate matters, surgeons opted not to operate unless the tumour showed signs of developing.

And so began Megan’s monthly brain scans, all while she was completing a History of Art degree.

“University was where Megan’s priorities were,” Helen tells NR Times. “The main focus at that point was to get her epileptic episodes under control.

“We weren’t referred to a neurosurgeon until the following January – that’s six months after her first episode.

“We were completely out of our depth; we had no idea what was going on. We had been told in October that she had a brain tumour, but that was it.”

It was the lack of available support that really concerned and surprised Helen.

“There was nothing,” she says, when asked about the help they received after Megan’s diagnosis. “We were just left in a vacuum.

“That’s what I couldn’t understand, because if you’re diagnosed with breast cancer, you’re assigned a clinical nurse specialist. We didn’t have that.

“I spent a long time on the internet trying to find where the support and information was and I desperately needed to talk to somebody about the impact that this diagnosis had, but there was nobody.”

Helen was left on her own in search of a solution for Megan, spending countless hours learning more about brain tumours and possible treatments.

This led her to discover neurosurgeon Peter Black from Boston, who agreed to operate on the tumour after a consultation.

The severity of brain tumours is graded from one to four. Black was the first surgeon to tell Megan she had a grade two tumour, but it could transform into a higher grade within five years, with the consequences being potentially fatal.

With that in mind Megan decided she would have the tumour removed. Because of the risks involved with the surgery, however, the procedure was delayed until after she had finished her studies.

Through all this Helen was fighting her own battle after being told she had head and neck cancer.

She quickly underwent radiotherapy and surgery, knowing she needed to stay strong for her daughter.

“I was just focused on getting fit so that I could go with Meg to America for the surgery.”

Helen was able to make a full recovery, but then faced the challenge of funding Megan’s £30,000 surgery.

Megan’s group of friends were desperate to help and agreed to do some fundraising, eventually smashing their target and generating £70,000.

After this, things finally started to run smoothly. Megan was able to finish her degree and successfully underwent surgery in 2007 which saw her tumour removed.

“We had such a good story and we’d learned so much,” Helen says. “We thought we’ve got one of two options; we can either go back to our lives as they were and donate what we’ve got left to another charity. Or we can use those funds to set up a charity which was going to close the gap in the marketplace.

“Who do you turn to the day you’re told you have a brain tumour? There’s nobody out there and we didn’t want people to feel as lost as we did.”

From this Brainstrust was born.

Starting off simply as a helpline, the charity has evolved into a support trust with UK-wide reach, developing communities to reduce isolation, build resilience and enable people to live the life they want.

It focuses on providing evidence based information around brain tumours and its support specialists can point people to the correct resources, without forcing anything upon them.

“The only other charities that existed at that time were all to do with lab-based research, there was no charity out there where you could pick up the phone and ask for help.

“Because we have that experience, we knew what the information was that people would want to hear.

“Meg and I knew what it meant to be both a patient and a caregiver, so we used that 360 degree perspective to support others.”

Since then Brainstrust has gone on to support thousands of patients and their families.

The vast majority (93 per cent) of those that contacted the charity reported a positive outcome, with nearly 1,000 new patients engaging with it in 2019.

Since its founding in 2006, care around brain tumours has drastically improved.

It is the most common form of cancer that affects those under 40 and it is one that is rising at the fastest rate in over 65s.

Discussing how attitudes to brain tumours have changed, Helen says that new technologies can lead the way to better outcomes.

“Your first line treatment with a brain tumour should always be, where possible, neurosurgery. That was what saved our daughter’s life.

“I think the technology is absolutely key and probably until the last five years, that’s been hugely ignored, but it is catching up.

“In terms of the actual therapies, I think with radiotherapy we’ve made huge advances.”

Despite this progress, Helen says there are still huge differences between the treatment of brain tumour patients and those with other cancers and conditions.

She draws on the example of post-stroke rehab and the general care stroke survivors receive.

“Stroke patients get a wonderful wraparound reablement service and I’d love to see brain cancer having a parity.

“I find that some of the attitudes are a bit nihilistic, as in if you’re diagnosed with a glioblastoma people tend to see this as life limiting with a poor prognosis so it’s not worth investing in. I think it absolutely is.

“That’s the one thing I would love to be able to transform, the day somebody has a brain tumour,
they immediately get that same wraparound care.”

Megan is currently living a happy and healthy life since her surgery, being able to get married and gifting Helen with two granddaughters.

She still undergoes regular brain scans and, after becoming a qualified coach with Brainstrust, she is now training to become a psychodynamic psychotherapist (a discipline involving the interpretation of mental and emotional processes rather than focusing on behaviour).

Reflecting on her journey Helen describes her pride in the work they had done so far, but admits there is still much work to be done.

“It’s been a highly emotional rollercoaster at times, we get very tired but it’s not a job it’s a vocation.

“It’s important not to forget that before we’re patients, we’re people and I think the more we can get clinicians to recognise that sitting in front of them is a person not a patient, then that person is going to be much more resilient.

“Just hearing the testimonials of the impact that our work has had is what keeps us going.

“I will always remember Meg saying to me ‘I would never wish a brain tumour on anybody, but in a way I’m glad this has happened because of what we’ve achieved.’”

Continue Reading


Loneliness in lockdown – how have survivors been impacted?



Loneliness in lockdown among brain injury survivors is the subject of a new research study which hopes to shine a light on the ongoing issue of isolation. 

While loneliness for the wider population was something rarely previously experienced prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, for those living with a brain injury, the everyday reality is often very different. 

And through this new study, researchers hope to discover the true effect the pandemic and its necessity for survivors to stay at home – and in some instances shield for several months – has had and how their protective factors have impacted on that. 

The project, by the University of Sunderland in conjunction with Headway, is currently gathering participants for its pioneering research, which will compare the experiences of people living with brain injury to those without. 

Led by Dr Stephen Dunne, who has a long-standing research interest in social factors which affect brain injury and stroke survivors, he hopes it will both raise awareness of the ongoing issue of loneliness many people face, as well as helping to inspire action.  

“There is a dual focus to this project – loneliness is something known to the masses now more than ever before; it’s not just something felt by a particular part of the population. For a neurotypical individual, I think it has shown what life can be like to be lonely in ways they may never have known previously. 

“An important point of our research is to try and understand how, for people with brain injury, their loneliness and their perceptions of loneliness have been affected during the pandemic – has this been heightened over the past year and been exacerbated by lockdown? 

“Or have they actually felt less lonely than neurotypical individuals, as they have had the experience pre-pandemic of adapting to life like this, and already have the support strategies in place?

“But crucially, the future of this project isn’t to define loneliness, understand its impact, then drop it – we want to understand it so that we can facilitate the removal of barriers so we can bring about strategic improvements to the wellbeing of people living with brain injury.” 

Dr Dunne and his team are seeking brain injury survivors nationally to take part in the research, which will be done by a survey: and an optional additional interview with the team remotely via Microsoft Teams. 

“We’re at a crucial stage now where we appear to be coming out of restrictions, but the experiences of the past year are still very real for so many people,” adds Dr Dunne. 

“We want to do this at the right time, before reintegration into society starts to happen and we are looking retrospectively, so we’re keen to hear the experiences of as many people as possible.

“We want to better understand loneliness and its impact, so we can help to bring about change for the future. Understanding the journey of brain injury survivors over the past year is a key part of us being able to do that.” 

For further information about the research study, or to share experiences through an interview with the research team, contact

Continue Reading


Temporary concussion substitutes ‘must be introduced by June 1’



Temporary concussion substitutes must be included in the current trials underway in the Premier League to safeguard the safety of players, players’ unions said today. 

FIFPRO and the PFA have called for the introduction of temporary substitutes no later than June 1, and for the scope of the 18-month trial – which enables a team to replace a player who has sustained concussion, but on a permanent basis – be extended to include parallel trials for temporary substitutions. 

In an open letter to IFAB, football’s lawmakers, FIFPRO – which represents over 65,000 professional footballers worldwide – and the PFA highlighted the cases of West Ham United’s Issa Diop and Sheffield United’s George Baldock in making their case. 

“Player safety and welfare is paramount, and should be the only priority,” they say in their letter. 

While both bodies were supportive of the permanent concussion trials when introduced, such incidents – added to the new FIFPRO poll, which shows 83 per cent of 96 professional football club doctors at top-flight European club believe temporary substitutes should form part of future protocol – have shown that action needs to be taken. 

“In England, since the trial began, we are aware of two incidents where a temporary substitution option would have better protected players,” states the letter. 

“In each case, the players suffered from a head injury but, following an initial on-field assessment, continued to play. They were subsequently removed when it emerged their head injury was worse than first thought.

“These cases underline our concern that permanent substitutions do not give medical teams the appropriate environment to assess a player with a potentially serious head injury.

“The reality of the in-game situation is loaded with pressure. Medical teams can be presented with a situation where a globally broadcast match is on hold, awaiting their assessment. They have to make a potentially game-altering decision in a multi-billion-pound industry.

“We have no doubt medical teams act in the sole interests of the players. However, the rules do not do enough to support medical personnel. Pressure on them will be amplified with the return of crowds.”

The letter states that the inclusion of temporary concussion substitutions, which they propose should be tested in parallel with the current trial, will:

  • Provide medical teams with additional assessment time
  • Allow for the assessment to take place in an appropriate environment
  • Permit a match to restart with neither side numerically disadvantaged
  • Reduce pressure on players and medical staff to make quick decisions.

“In December 2020, we welcomed the decision by IFAB to invite competitions to trial permanent concussion substitutions,” FIFPRO and the PFA state.

“At the same time, we have remained in favour of testing temporary concussion substitutions. This has been our position for many years.

“Since the beginning of IFAB’s permanent concussion substitute trial, we have seen several incidents where the new laws of the game have fallen short of their objective and jeopardised player health and safety.”

Continue Reading


Get the NR Times update