Connect with us
  • Elysium

Brain injury

Drake Foundation: ‘Research can protect players and enable change’

CEO Lauren Pulling tells NR Times of the Foundation’s commitment to protecting player welfare through better understanding the impact of injury

Published

on

A professional footballer balances a football on his head marking the release of a study into footballers risk of dementia

As one of the first organisations to recognise and react to the urgent need to address head injury in sport, The Drake Foundation has become a central player in the fast-developing debate over how to best protect players at all levels from the devastating later-life impact of neurodegenerative disease. 

Established by philanthropist James Drake in 2014, in the wake of an injury to then-Tottenham Hotspur goalkeeper Hugo Lloris during which he was knocked unconscious during a match but was allowed to carry in playing, the organisation is committed to delivering the research which will hold the key to making change. 

The Foundation has been behind some of the most significant research projects to date in uncovering the impact of head injury in sport, including the Drake Rugby Biomarker Study, the first of its kind to make use of advanced neuroimaging.  

The landmark BRAIN and HEADING projects – which investigate the impact of concussion in former players aged 50 and over in rugby and football respectively – are both helping to shed new light on links to neurodegenerative disease. 

Over £2million has already been invested in research by the Foundation, which describes itself as being at the intersection between sports, science and society, to not only improve sports player welfare but also to advance knowledge and understanding of the brain and brain diseases in sport and across society as a whole. 

Further pioneering projects are now underway, including one with retired rugby players from the pre-professional era, the findings of which could help shape the adaptations needed to properly protect players in the game in its current form. 

And the need for such research is vital in helping to understand what happens in players’ brains so action can be taken to protect current and future players, says Lauren Pulling, CEO of The Drake Foundation. 

“Over the last couple of years we’ve really seen the conversation on this topic shift and more people are now invested in it, it’s not just a concern for retired players who were playing decades ago, it’s a very real concern for everyone whether they’re a youth player now, whether they’ve recently retired from elite sport or whether they’re an amateur player,” she tells NR Times. 

“It’s now become a conversation everyone is involved in so it’s really critical we have more research and ongoing research in this area to really pinpoint exactly what is happening in the brain, but alongside that so that sports governing bodies can take real action as well. 

“While it’s going to take a while to build the full picture of what’s happening in the brain, we need to be making significant changes to pre-emptively and universally reduce players’ exposure to head impacts.

“When you know more what the actual cause is you can target that, which will help governing bodies with any protocol changes to make sport safer.”

Already, the Foundation’s research has produced some worrying findings, with its Rugby Biomarker Study revealing that almost a quarter – 23 per cent – of current rugby players sampled had abnormalities in white matter of vasculature of their brain. 

While some moves are being made to tackle the issue of player safety, based on the research that exists to date – including the limit on full-contact training in rugby and restriction on high-force heading in football training – the Foundation is keen to see more action taken, backed by enforceable laws from governing bodies. 

“I think for players to feel safe and youth players going into the game to feel safe, there need to be universal enforced law changes that minimise their cumulative exposure to head impacts, not just in the game but in training as well,” says Lauren. 

“We want to see more from sports governing bodies. We’re really pleased to see recent changes to guidelines like the limit on full contact training in rugby and guidance to reduce heading in football in training in particular – but we’d question whether it could go even further.

“I think we need to stop being tentative and go for enforced law changes rather than guidance.”

The need for such action is becoming ever-more apparent, with players of all levels speaking out about their concerns around participation. 

“We did some market research at the beginning of this year with amateur players and the parents of youth players in both football and rugby, the results of that were really concerning,” says Lauren. 

“Two thirds of parents and amateur rugby players were concerned about the long-term impact of the sport on their brain health around half of parents and players in football wanted to see a reduction in heading. 

“Seeing that people are that concerned, and that’s what the attitude is not just in elite sport but in the amateur grassroots game, that tell us action needs to be taken before not just more players are affected, but also for the future of the game. 

“If people are dropping out then what does the future of sport look like? So I think we need to make some big changes to protect the players and the game so we don’t see another generation of this happening.”

In addition to its ongoing research, the Foundation also sees collaboration as being key to change being made around head injury in sport. Its symposium meeting brings together researchers, sports governing bodies, medical experts and other stakeholders in the debate to continue to drive the issue forward. 

“There’s definitely a shift to everyone moving towards the same direction now, what we’re doing with our symposium is trying to unite that even more,” says Lauren. 

“With COVID it’s been tricky to get everyone in a room and talk about the direction we’re going in, but with our symposium this year there will be a renewed focus on everyone going in the same direction, taking a united approach to tackling this issue. 

“I think there’s likely more that could be done and that’s something that we are always on the lookout for. I think it will be interesting to see in light of the Government inquiry the effect that will have on uniting all the stakeholders in this field.”

Going forward, in addition to the research and collaboration, technology is playing in increasingly central role in the issue. In addition to the advanced neuroimaging which is helping The Drake Foundation in its research, innovations including a mouthguard with a sensor which can deliver real-time information to medical teams on the sidelines, are helping to provide quantifiable statistics which will help to inform research further still. 

“Technology has a huge role to play in it all, in the seven years The Drake Foundation has been in this field, technology has advanced hugely,” says Lauren.

“The advanced neuroimaging that was used in the Drake Rugby Biomarker Study wasn’t part of the original proposal for that study nearly seven years ago, it has been brought along as the study progressed and I think that could turn into a really valuable tool, looking at changes to microstructures to the brain that can’t be picked up by standard MRI. 

“What we don’t know at the moment are the long-term changes to white matter or vasculature so that will be a really interesting one to follow over the next few years, there is no short cut there so we need longitudinal studies using advanced neuroimaging. 

“And on the sensor side, I think big data has done a lot, not just in this field but in science and medicine, so I think the more data we can gather can only be a good thing. 

“What is important is how the data is then used whether it’s all put into one big data set, can we use that as a common data set, is the data comparable across different studies and sports, that will be an interesting one to see over the coming years.” 

Brain injury

‘Take urgent action on rugby player safety’

Rugby’s authorities must act now to protect players at all levels, following publication of the landmark BRAIN study

Published

on

rugby players in a scrum with their heads and shoulders down

Rugby’s governing authorities are being urged to take “urgent preventative action” to protect players at all levels of the sport after new research suggests the game may have been safer in the pre-professional era. 

The BRAIN study, published today, found that former elite rugby players who experienced three or more concussions during their career did not have worse cognitive function before the age of 75 than those who had experienced no, or just one or two, concussions. 

The study found no overall group association between concussion history and worse cognitive function, but did find that 29 per cent of over 75s who had sustained three or more rugby-related concussions during their career had significantly worse cognitive function.

However, results from the BRAIN study – funded by The Drake Foundation, which worked with 146 former elite rugby players in England aged 50 and over, most of whom played in the pre-professional era – call into question whether safety standards in the sport have worsened since the game became professional.  

Several retired players from the modern era have recently been diagnosed with early-onset neurodegenerative disease and likely Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE). 

In addition, the neuroimaging results of the Drake Rugby Biomarker Study, published earlier this year, found that 23 per cent of current elite adult rugby players tested had abnormalities in brain structure, and half showed an unexpected change in brain volume.

The Foundation has also been vocal in its campaign to make recommendations around safety in rugby and football enforceable rules, and is now calling for further immediate emphasis on player welfare. 

“These findings are broadly reassuring for players from the amateur era,” says Lauren Pulling, CEO of The Drake Foundation. 

“However, given the findings of the Drake Rugby Biomarker Study and recent cases of early-onset brain disease in ex-players from the professional era, the new study results do call into question how long-term health might differ in players from the modern era.

“The evidence we have so far suggests that the sport may actually be travelling in the wrong direction in terms of player welfare and brain health. 

“In addition to further research, we therefore also urge the sport’s governing bodies to review the modern game’s laws and protocols and take urgent, preventative action to universally reduce players’ exposure to head impacts both in matches and training.”

Additional research carried out this month on behalf of The Drake Foundation by Censuswide, via an online survey of 508 respondents in the UK who are involved in rugby union, found that 62 per cent of adults who either play amateur rugby or have a child who plays rugby are concerned about the long-term effects of the sport on their or their child’s brain health. 

This figure rises to 73 per cent for parents who do not play the game themselves, but who have a child that does.

Over 60 per cent agree that rugby has become a more dangerous sport at all levels since it turned professional in 1995, whilst 66 per cent believe that rugby union would be safer if fundamental law changes were introduced to better reflect the way the sport was played in the pre-professional era.

James Drake, founder of The Drake Foundation, says: “As a passionate sports fan who loves rugby, I’ve witnessed first-hand the way the game has evolved since turning professional. 

“In my view it’s a sport that has become ostensibly less safe for the players involved and my concerns are reflected by our research this month, which reveals 61 per cent of adults who either play the game or have children that do, are concerned about the sport’s long-term effect on brain health.

“A further two thirds of adults believe the sport could be made safer if law changes were introduced to return it to the game as it was played in the amateur era. The Drake Foundation is calling on rugby’s authorities to give this immediate consideration to protect the sport we love and the current and future generations who play it.”

The BRAIN study is the first to carry out detailed measurements of cognitive function in a large number of former players and to relate this to their concussion and playing history. 

It was conducted by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Queen Mary University of London and the Institute of Occupational Medicine with researchers from UCL and the University of Oxford, and with assistance from the Rugby Football Union (RFU). 

It is also the first to include substantial numbers from the over-75 age-group. Previous studies which have focussed on younger players have found little or no association between concussions and reduced cognitive function.

Continue Reading

Brain injury

Digital information boosts GPs’ support for brain injury survivors

Published

on

Brain injury survivors can now access digital information from their GPs to help increase the levels of support and signposting currently available through a new partnership. 

Headway has teamed up with online platform Healthinote to help GPs to give survivors and their carers and families personalised information, which is sent to them digitally after their appointments to read and digest at home. 

The ‘health information prescription’ is presented through visual, immersive and interactive content, and increases both the range and accessibility of virtual resources available to people living with brain injuries. 

Healthinote, which is integrated into the eConsult platform, is in use in over 1,700 GP practices nationwide and can be accessed by over 13,700 GPs. 

The availability of dedicated brain injury resources from Headway, presented via the accessible and engaging channels delivered by Healthinote, is enabling GPs to increase their support to survivors and maximise use of what can be used to support patients remotely. 

“We want to empower people to understand their treatment or condition and supply them with the right health information at the right time,” says Alex Merckx, director of marketing and partnerships at Cognitant, the business which developed and manages Healthinote. 

“Getting accurate information into patients’ hands is very important. Consultations with your GP are very quick and there can be a lot to take in, and while they tell us not to Google things afterwards, of course we all do, and that can lead to misinformation. 

“By using Healthinote, GPs can supply verified, trusted, accurate information to patients and carers, and supplement the work they do face to face. The information is saved to a patient’s electronic record, so if they go on to see a doctor or nurse afterwards, things can be more joined up and they know what resources they have had access to. 

“We are trying to add value to a GP consultation and effectively maximise the customer experience that you would expect from any service, to ensure patients can go away with the information and signposting they need in a format they can understand.”

“The complex, fluctuating and often hidden effects of brain injury can make it difficult for people to get the help and support they need,” says Peter McCabe, chief executive of Headway.

“We recognise the challenges faced by GPs in not only understanding the complexities of brain injury, but also signposting survivors and carers to specialist information and services.

“Too many people slip through the net and are left to cope with impact of brain injury without help of support.

“That’s why this partnership with Healthinote is so exciting.

“It will make it easier for GPs to provide patient or carer-specific information from Headway, whether in the form of our award-winning publications or signposting to local Headway groups or branches, helping us meet our goal of ensuring no one has to deal with brain injury alone.”

Continue Reading

Brain injury

‘Revise way concussion is viewed to achieve real change’

“We’re getting it wrong in society and healthcare,” says Dr Adam J White of the Concussion Legacy Foundation UK

Published

on

Views of concussion in society must be altered, alongside much-needed revision of protocols in sport – particularly at grassroots – if change in how head injury is viewed and dealt with is truly going to happen, says Dr Adam J White, executive director of the Concussion Legacy Foundation UK. NR Times learns more

 

Since the launch of the UK chapter of the Concussion Legacy Foundation (CLF) last month, its accompanying helpline has seen huge demand for support from veterans and amateur athletes concerned at the impact of their head injuries and the implications of sustaining them.  

The CLF has set ambitious targets to prevent new cases of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) within five years and of finding a cure by 2040. 

And in being able to achieve that, Dr Adam J White, executive director of CLF UK, says as well as making the necessary changes within sport to protect players, concussion must also be recognised for its seriousness in wider society. 

“Concussion is an issue in sport, it’s an issue in the military, but it’s an issue in everyday life. And it’s an area where we’re just getting it wrong in terms of society and healthcare,” Dr White tells NR Times. 

‘We’re not doing enough to support people with mild traumatic brain injuries, they’re falling between the gaps. They’ve got some real complex needs that aren’t being catered for by the NHS in the UK at the moment, and that’s a real worry. 

“Through the helpline, we’ve had a huge number of people seeking help with their concussions and I think more and more people will be presenting to us. And I hope more and more people do, because it’s not trivial, it is important. 

“These are serious injuries, each and every one of them, so they do need to be given support for that condition.

“At the moment, the kinds of guidance they’re getting is inadequate, they’re often being told to go home and rest and are often given very little other information. Depending on which hospital you attend depends on what kind of information you’re going to get.

“Often, there’ll be no further referral or no follow-up, typically you’re told if anything deteriorates come back, but people are often not given any treatment plans or support with a huge raft of needs from motor needs, coordination, headaches, sleep disorders. People are then left to fend for themselves, which can impact significantly on their lives.”

Through the work of CLF in its native United States and its role in establishing the world-leading VA-BU-CLF Brain Bank in Boston – which it is now building further around the world, including in the UK with the creation of the CLF Project – huge advances have been made in understanding the causes of CTE, with links now proven with repeated head impacts over a period of time. 

As a result, CLF’s founder Dr Chris Nowinski – whose exposé of NFL safety protocols in 2006 is credited as revolutionising the sport – has become a leading advocate of the need to protect children from the impact of heading. 

“Delaying heading as much as we can to restart it much later is a really great first step,” says Dr White. 

“By saying there will be no heading until 14 or 16 or 18, we’re reducing our exposure, which would be fantastic. It’s not a core component of the game. It could be removed and most of the game would maintain its beauty, its fun, its enjoyment. So that could be a great first step. 

“Sport is a difficult nut to crack but we can affect changes. We’ve given sport five years to stop all new cases of CTE, but we could do it tomorrow. The reality is we know how to make this condition stop, but we need to be bold enough and brave enough to make the change. 

“What we need to do is reduce the exposure, and then making sure that in tandem with that, we are making sure when players do get concussed, that we deal with it properly, so we’re not returning players the same week, we’re making sure they have plenty of time to rest and recover.

“We’re making sure that they’re not putting their brains through lots of extra stress and they’re not coming back to full contract sessions. We need to see all of those those policies and protocols put in place.”

While change is indeed starting to happen, with measures being taken including restrictions on full-contact training in rugby and high-force heading in football training, Dr White says advocacy has a huge role to play in driving this forward further still. 

“I think in terms of preventing this issue in the future, it’s about the players, it’s about the parents and the grassroots game,” he says. 

“Athletes often forget the power they have. If they decide to vote with their feet, if parents decide that they’re not going to let their kids do this anymore, it’ll change. But we’ve seen there has been plenty of opportunity for sport to make the change themselves and they’ve never been brave enough to do it. 

“Now, we’re seeing more and more people saying, no, we’re not going to allow this. People are asking do I want my daughter to be heading the ball, do I want this for my child, and we really need them to continue to do that. Children can do so many other kinds of physical activity and exercise but without the risks.”

Continue Reading

Newsletter



Get the NR Times update

Trending